Ponniyin Selvan Varalaatru Peravai

Here is the evidence,dr sridhar rathnam

from current issue of outlook:
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?
fodname=20040913&fname=Krishna&sid=1&pn=2

Krishna (b. July 21, 3228 BC)

when Arun K. Bansal, the father of computer astrology in India,
says that Hindu god Krishna was born on July 21, 3228 bc, it feels
momentous somehow.But backtracking into the past can be a sloppy
misadventure if you don't get your calculations right. So Bansal
rests his claims on two of his software packages—the Leo Gold and
the Palm computer programmes. They can simulate any planetary
configuration that has occurred or could occur in time.

All they need is a date. And July 21, 3228 bc, according to Bansal,
satisfies every condition described during Krishna's birth. Krishna
was born in the Rohini nakshatra, in the Hindu month of Bhadrapada,
on the 8th day of the waning moon at midnight. Bansal says this was
enough information for him to nail the date, working backwards from
Krishna's death, which he says occurred at 2 pm on February 18, 3102
bc.
His




entire case rests on the accuracy of this date, however. Bansal
quotes extensively from the Shrimad Bhagwat and the Shri Vishnu
Puranas, old Hindu calendars and the Mahabharata to illuminate the
clues he chose to follow. "A shloka in the 38th chapter of the Shri
Vishnu Puran, says that Kaliyuga started on the day Krishna died."
He unearths another shloka in the Shrimad Bhagwat Purana (part 11,
chapter 6) where Brahma himself speaks to Krishna about how old he
is. "Brahma says that 125 years have passed since Krishna's birth;
this is just before Krishna plans his death."
Though not empirically verifiable, the advent of Kaliyuga is
traditionally taken to be 3102 bc, because all our panchangas or
astrological journals maintain that 5,100 years of Kaliyuga had
passed before 1999 AD. The belief is supported by mathematician
Aryabhatta's astronomy treatise Aryabhattiya, the Surya Siddhanta,
an astronomical text that dates back to 400 AD, and a 5th century
inscription from a temple in Aihole.

Deleting 125 years from the date, Bansal figured Krishna was born
either in 3327 or 3228 bc. The rest he left up to his software,
merely feeding in the planetary configuration that Krishna was
supposedly born under, to generate the row of figures that conforms
to the epochal moment.

Would astrology have thrown any light on what such an individual may
have been like? Outlook asked Bansal to create a birth chart based
on the date. His computer churns out 15 pages sectioned under
tantalising headings like Love & Romance, Appearance, Personality,
and Journeys. With Saturn in his seventh house, he would have been
fated to court many women—enter Radha, the gopis and later his
16,108 wives. But since the seventh house was also under the sign of
Scorpio, which guarantees a joyful marital life, he'd also have had
the power to keep them happy despite having to divide his attentions
among them.
At peace with his research, Bansal prefers to turn a blind eye to
the long, long line of astrologers, godmen, NASA scientists,
mathematicians and writers stretching all the way back to Aryabhatta
who have worked on the same thing. They all quote the same
scriptures, taking into account some or all of the astral happenings
recorded in great detail, especially the ones during the calamitous
time of the Mahabharata war, when Krishna was said to have been 90
years old. These include rare astronomical happenings like the solar
and lunar eclipse that occurred consecutively in the space of a
month just before the war, a fortnight that lasted only for 13 days
instead of 15 when the moon was waning, and a comet that burned
through the skies. Also, the planetary positions recorded during the
Mahabharata war were roughly replicated 36 years later, when Krishna
died.

Most scholars prefer to concentrate on the Mahabharata war where a
significant cluster of astronomical events occurred, before zooming
onto their own set of dates that binds down the life of the eighth
avatar of Vishnu in a specific time-frame. But the dates, while
drawn from the same source, strain in opposite directions.

At a colloquium organised by the Mythic Society in Bangalore in
January last year, dates as wide as 1478 bc to 3067 bc were
proposed. Contributors included S. Balakrishna (from NASA, US),
using Lodestar Pro software, who proposed 2559 bc as the start of
the war. Prof R.N. Iyengar (from the Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore) brought the event closer historically, suggesting the
date 1478 bc, while B.N. Narahari Achar (Department of Physics,
University of Memphis, US) after "critically examining" the
astronomical events in the Mahabharata pointed to 3067 bc.

Authors like P.V. Vartak push back the date of the Mahabharata much
further, to 5561 bc. Swami Prakashanand Saraswati, in his book, The
True History and the Religion of India, comes up with the same dates
as Bansal does.


Friend,there dies your theory of aryanization in
3ooo bc.Mahabharatha is much younger to ramayana which in turn is
even younger to vedic age.Agathya is much older than ramayana.Do you
mean to say that aryans invaded in 5000 bc or even earlier?Doesnt
make much sense,does it?