Pavithra Srinivasan avarkalukku, With reference to your question as to why the names of Tamil Years are in Sanskrit, instead of being in Tamil, is a point which I too have been thinking over for quite some time. That is the reason why I have in my posting referred to as, TAMIL (or HINDU ??) CYCLIC OF YEARS.
Today when you refer through many books from Tamil Nadu on Festivals of Tamil Nadu and on Astrology, it is noted that many of them refer to the 60 - year cycle as the Tamil Cycle of Years. Also 'every year' in this cycle is "referred to" as the name of a new Tamil Year.
But as we all could see the names have a Sanskrit base. Also we note that the Chola Inscriptions from Tamil Nadu very seldom make reference to these years, but normally says that an event took place say in the 5th year or 13th year etc from the time the Chola king who acended the throne.
But the Chola Inscriptions from the Karnataka State had a different way of mentioning the time of an event. Most of them carried the Saka year when the event took place, and in many cases also mentions the name of the Year.
But what is interesting to note is that the name of the years that are found in these inscriptions are the exact names of what we see in the 60 year cycle which we call as the Tamil Cycle of Years.
As examples I append below parts of four Chola inscriptions, which were found from the Karnataka State.
(1) "In the 9th year of the increasing reign of victory of the glorious emperor of the three worlds Vikkrama Choladeva in the P(i) lava year which was the Saka year 1049 on the occasion of an eclipse of moon in the month of Jyaishtha..."
EPIGRAPHICA INDICA - Vol 6, No 7.
(2) "In the twenty eighth year of glorious Rajaraja Chola corresponded to the Paridavin year the Saka 934..."
EPIGRAPHICA CARNATICA - Part 1, No 140
(3) "In the twenty second year of the king Parakesarivarman alias the glorious Rajendra Chola deva who conquered the Purvadesam, the Ganga and Kadarem on Sunday Mula (nakshatra) during the first thithi of the bright fortnight of Margasira in the Srimuka year the 955-th of the hundreds of years passed from the time of the Saka king..."
EPIGRAPHICA INDICA - Vol 6 No 3
(4) "On monday the nakshattra Swathi during the Kalashtami (thithi) of the month of Ashadha in the Isvara year the 959-th Saka year in the twenty sixth year of the glorious Mudikonda Gangaikonda Rajendra Choladeva...."
EPIGRAPHICA CARNATICA - Vol 4, Hg 104
What makes me think on the strength of these Inscriptions is that there could be a possibility of these 60 - Year Cycle was known and was in practice in Karnataka which was not used in Tamil Nadu, and with Tamil Nadu coming under the rule of Vijayanagara Empire (of Karnataka), possibly these 60 - Year Cycle came in to practice in Tamil Nadu as much as the Carnatic Music found its place in Tamil Nadu overshadowing the traditional Tamil Music & Ragas (Panns).
Thank you very very much. I've been racking my brain about this for months now.
> Pavithra Srinivasan avarkalukku,
Please refer to me as just 'Pavithra'. I'm not that old:-)
> But as we all could see the names have a Sanskrit base. Also we note that the Chola Inscriptions from Tamil Nadu very seldom make > reference to these years, but normally says that an event took place say in the 5th year or 13th year etc from the time the Chola king who acended the throne.
Yes. I've noticed this too - but it's significance escaped me.
> What makes me think on the strength of these Inscriptions is that > there could be a possibility of these 60 - Year Cycle was known and > was in practice in Karnataka which was not used in Tamil Nadu, and > with Tamil Nadu coming under the rule of Vijayanagara Empire (of > Karnataka), possibly these 60 - Year Cycle came in to practice in > Tamil Nadu as much as the Carnatic Music found its place in Tamil > Nadu overshadowing the traditional Tamil Music & Ragas (Panns).
That's amazing, sir! :-) This is probably the best explanation I've come across - to this question. The impact of the Vijayanagara Empire...now that's a very novel concept. Also, possibly, the closest to the truth. Also logical. [SB sir, what do you think?]
But in that case...was this how the common people of Tamil Nadu referred to each year? I can understand this method being adopted in inscriptions...surely they didn't refer to every year as the regnal year of such-and-such a king??
I have one other doubt.:-) [of which more in another mail.]
Thanks again - you've opened up a new thought wave.:-)