There are minimum about 500 messages related to this.
For SUMMERISING ::
1. NEITHER KULOTHUNGA I, NOR HIS SON VIKRAMA- NOR HIS SON KULOTHUNGA II - is TERMED AS KIRUMI KANDA CHOLAN.. Kulothunga I kuladeivam was NARASIMHA SWAMI. 81 inscriptions re his Grants found in Srirangam temple.
2. " MUNDRIL KIDANTHA PERUMANAI KADALIL PUGAVITTU "" was the verse which generated this speculation ... We have gone into discussion that it was NIRMALYAM which was Sacredly put into the Sea.
4. Thiruchitrakoodam was hymned by Azhwars as THILLIA MOOVAYIRAVAR YETHUM THIRUCHITRHA KOODAM. Means It was worshipped by Thillai moovayiravar - according to Azhwars.
PLS READ RELATED PRABANDHAS OF THIRUCHITRAKOODAM before posting NEXT MAIL on this.
PAADAGAMS (Portraits - as was in whorship )- whose Nirmalyams replaced.
BAMA IN CHARIOT - GOLDEN IMAGE was reportedly found from Chidambaram. In all probablities, the PAADAGAMS were replaced with Golden images and looted by Invaders.
We are also aware of thuppalli Krishnappa period episode. It was reported from the Diary of a passerby (French I recall ) ....
ALL FACTS ARE KNOWN TO ALL OF US.
Request you ::
Please READ Prabandhams related to THILLAI CHITRA KOODAM.
You will find the harmony prevailed and much more too.
//81inscriptions re his Grants found in Srirangam temple.//
Is this true? I have seen the list of these inscriptions and majority of them, if not all, are grants by someone else to a vishnu temple, not necessarily Srirangam temple. Just because those inscriptions say his regnal years do they need to be considered as his grants? Did anyone closely examined those 81 inscriptions to confirm that all of them are regarding 'his' grants?