He was the only king who withstood the onslaught of Mahmud of Ghazni
  • http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080131/jsp/nation/story_8844477.jsp

    History, rescued from scrap
    - Bookseller digs out Chandela copper plate
    MANDIRA NAYAR
    New Delhi, Jan. 30: Toufiq Ahmed Chisti scours scrap shops for
    pieces of heritage.

    Like a modern-day Aladdin, Chisti, who runs National Book Depot in
    Uttar Pradesh's Amroha, drops by at scrap dealers in towns to
    retrieve inscriptions, ancient manuscripts and even old guns so they
    aren't lost forever.

    One of his prized possessions, dating back to 1016 AD, is a rare
    copper plate that bears a signed inscription of Vidyadhar, the
    Chandela dynasty's most important ruler. The plate was about to be
    melted for its metallic value when Chisti saved it from a bazaar in
    Kanpur.

    The discovery has delighted the Archaeological Survey of India,
    whose joint director-general B.R Mani dubbed the copper plate a "a
    very significant find". Chisti sent the ASI a carefully photographed
    copy of the inscription — broken into halves — so that it could be
    read.

    "The plate bears Vidyadhar's sign. It is rare to find an inscription
    signed by a king. The only other such inscription we have is that of
    King Harshvardhan," Mani said.

    Around 2ft long and weighing 4.25kg, the inscription is much larger
    than those that have been found so far. "Usually inscriptions are
    smaller. This one is like a stone inscription. I am still to
    decipher what's written in the middle of the plate. But so far, we
    have been able to trace Vidyadhar's genealogy," Mani said.

    Vidyadhar, famous for his architecture and sculptures, had built the
    Kandariya Mahadeva temple in Khajuraho, among the biggest shrines
    dedicated to Shiva.

    Khajuraho, now in Madhya Pradesh, is part of the Bundelkhand region
    over which the Chandelas had ruled for much of the period between
    the 10th and 16th centuries AD.

    The plate might help end a debate among historians on whether
    Vidyadhar had withstood the onslaught of Persian invader Mahmud of
    Ghazni (971-1030 AD) or if he had surrendered.

    "On the inscription, Vidyadhar refers to himself as Kalanjarpati,
    which means the ruler of Kalanjar, the fort Ghazni surrounded.
    Vidhyadhar had many forts. Why would he choose Kalanjar if he had
    not won the war?" Mani said.

    "He was the only king who withstood the onslaught of Mahmud of
    Ghazni."
  • EXCELLENT POSTING .
    THANK YOU VIJAY.

    sps

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters