A history of kashmir pundits - by Jia Lal Kilam
  • http://www.kashmir-information.com/Kilam/index.html

    check out above ebook -

    some extracts..

    Chapter II - ends on a meloncholy note

    Thus ended the Hindu rule, not as a result of a foreign aggression,
    as in the case of the neighbouring province of the Punjab, but as a
    result of a long chain of events briefly surveyed in the foregoing
    pages.

    chapter iv

    Shahi Khan now known as Zainulabdin opened a new chapter in the
    earlier the Muslims, particularly the Arabs, had almost monopolized
    the trade in the East. Arab ships went as far as China and Japan. In
    the fourteenth century these traders had established their colonies
    in South India, Ceylon, Java, Sumatra, and even in China. Their
    contacts with races and religions other than their own had widened
    their outlook. The enormous gains which they reaped from trade
    abroad made them keep their countries open for non-Muslim traders
    too. Fresh ideas poured into the Muslim lands. With the free flow of
    ideas which now broke through the iron ring of strict isolation, it
    was but natural that the Governments too in most Muslim countries
    became very tolerant. Poets and philosophers with a radical outlook
    came into being and inspite of the rigidity of the Muslim Code there
    came about a revolution in men's minds.


    ......>>>>>>
    Zainulabdin got a poisonous boil which gave him much trouble. The
    court physicians tried their skill but failed, Jona Raja, the
    historian says "As flowers are not obtainable in the month of Magha
    on account of the mischief by snow, even so physicians who knew
    about poisons could not at that time be found in the country owing
    to Governmental oppression. The servants of the king at last found
    out Shri Bhatta who knew the antidotes of poisons and was well-
    versed in the art of healing, but out of fear he, for a long time
    delayed to come. When he arrived, the king gave him encouragement
    and he completely cured the king of the poisonous boil." The king
    wanted to make munificent gifts to Shri Bhatta. But the latter
    refused to accept any. But when pressed hard, he made a request
    which was to the effect that the Jazia on the Brahmans be remitted,
    and opportunities be assured to them to develop their mental and
    moral resources without any let or hinderance. The selflessness
    displayed by the physician Shri Bhatta had its effect upon the mind
    of the king. The request was accepted and Jazia was remitted. The
    Brahman was freed from the position of inferiority to which he was
    relegated by the previous kings.

    Shri Bhatta's selflessness and the acceptance of his request by the
    king proved a land-mark in the history of Hinduism in Kashmir


    Chapter V

    But Hassan Khan had his own virtues. The seed of cultural unity sown
    by Zainulabdin "had borne enough fruit in him". Hassan Khan was a
    great Sanskrit scholar and well-versed in the Hindu Philosophy. It
    is said about him that " the king freed of envy had learnt the six
    Schools of philosophy, and the different works of these six Schools
    became one in him." Making allowance for the poetical exaggeration
    of the poet historian, it can safely be inferred that Hassan Khan
    had drunk deep from the fountain of Sanskrit learning and his hatred
    for Hinduism was at the lowest ebb or had none at all. Shri Vara
    says that he made a good use of his wealth by building Mathas and
    endowing villages in favour of Brahmans." The Pandits performed a
    big Homa on the day of his coronation. The mere fact that the king
    permitted such a ceremony to be performed on the auspicious day of
    his coronation shows that he possessed a fair measure of religious
    toleration.

    Chapter VII

    Both man and nature combined its forces to work for their
    destruction. There was an acute class prejudice against them and
    every attempt was made to break their power and solidarity by such
    highly questionable methods as even death and forcible conversions.
    In every turmoil that rose and in every civil war that ensued the
    Pandit was dragged into it much against his will and he was made to
    pay his toll
  • Do you believe, these stories are reliable????

    How can the muslims be assumed to become broad minded, when they
    destroyed the very foundation of each and every non-islamic culture
    they came across.

    The caliphs, slaughtered even the sufi muslims, because they were
    involving in mystical experience. They could not even bear that these
    sufis are preaching spirituality.

    That happens, still today, when we see even the well educated, having
    wide exposure muslims indulge in terrible bombings.
  • Thaks a lot for sending useful information
    sowmyanarayanan
  • dear senthil

    You get to see what is written but not what happened. take the case
    Genghis Khan- he is an iconic and beloved figure in Mongolia, where
    he is seen as the father of the Mongol Nation. On the other hand, in
    many areas of southwestern Asia, Middle East and Europe, he is seen
    as a ruthless and bloodthirsty conquerer.

    Am sure RRC and RJC would have been seen in similar light in the
    countries they waged wars with - but for us they are heros.

    There are instances even within our own state - of religious
    intolerance - take instances of appar being tourtured by mahendra
    pallavar ( against his conversion from jainism to shivaite),
    ramanuja / vaisnavites were subjected to innumerable hardships
    during Kulothunga chola II ( still a point of contention) and
    subsequently ramanuja went on a 12-year exile in Melkote, in
    Karnataka.

    history is strive with these occurances - entire races/religions
    have been decimated - hv you heard of a now extinct religion called
    manuism.

    Its the premordial rule of nature - survivial of the fittest and the
    eternal quest for power - which has fueled human enterprise so far.
    A hungry lion is not expected to show mercy on a fawn simiarly a
    swooping eagle doesnt spare a chic...this is nature. eat or be
    eaten.

    so where is the question of mercy, being fair etc etc to your
    opponents.

    Our foremost epic mahabarta itself has these instances:

    The great krishna employed every possible guile to vanquish the
    kauravas - every death on the kaurava camp ( only one of abhimanyu
    in the opposite camp) right from bheesma, bagadatha, karna,
    duryodana - even the lofty yudishtira lied to get rid of drona ( his
    chariot was supposed to be moving a few feet of the ground till then
    and as he uttered this it fell to the ground...), - if there were a
    fair fight - each of these great warriors could have individually
    routed the pandava army....

    vj

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters