Your style of writing, the content delivery, the facts, pinpointing all exactly matches Jiddu Krishnamurti. In fact I would go to the extent saying you have used many of his sentences. :-) Just added one or two events to "customize" it for this group.
So I would say you are in a trap. :-)
Why?
Don't accept what I say, just use me as a mirror to see things. Don't judge anything, just observe it as it goes.
You said "I want you to look at this way!". Why? :-))
You said "if you SEE/ACT what I see, then you may change your viewpoint", but it means that what I/we will end up being to be is "change a viewpoint", but it is another viewpoint nonetheless. It means you are also having a "viewpoint", or a conclusion. So all you are struggling to do is trying to change a viewpoint. Why?
You said "division is going to create problem", much as what JK used to say. But shall we analyze what does "division" mean? Can "division" be created? Or is it an already created one? How can we divide anything? I mean, a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g? We CANNOT. We can divide only two separate things, but not the same thing...
How?
Can you divide yourself? Yes, you can say "this is my hand", "this is my leg", "this is my head"... Okay, now you have divided. So after this division can you say "this is not my hand" as you have divided? No, you cant. Because you have not divided, you have just IDENTIFIED. You have identified your hands, and you can appreciate it more.
So Chozhas, or any kings are IDENTIFIED amongst Tamil kings and not DIVIDED.
Therefore, it is not "dividing and comparing kings", it is "identifying and comparing kings". But "identifying and comapring" caste is different because it creates "division". Because "a caste" is separate as humans of that caste are separate... but Chozhas are not separate as History is not "separate".
But I may or may not subscribe to the above if you ask me the second time. ;-) Don't take it seriously.
Just a joke... JK template onnu vechchu innum naraya mails yezhudhalaam.
Now if you are familiar with Osho, you could reply like "Kings are real fakes. There is no proof for their existence. All said and wrote about them are lies. But God is real because I can show you God". :-))
Your mentioning of "Republicans Vs Democrats", the smile after "Man vs Woman" all reminds me of how JK used to "discuss". :-)