I will give in brief how Vali inslts Rama.See how Kambar handles the situation.Vali lies on the ground with the arrow of Rama in his heart.What did he see in that arrow?He saw the name Ram inscribed in it.How does the parama vaishnava kambar describe ram's name?
He describes it as "the manthra that is the basis for all 3 worlds,the name that gives ram itself to the one who chants it,the medicine for sins of 7 births--"Raman" vali saw it in his dying eyes."
Then vali sees Rama and starts abusing him.How does he start the abuse?
"Thooyavane..." see the beginning of the abuse.Thooyavane.
Next is "3 ulagamum unathu andro...".See the abuse.
Next "oviyathu elutha onna uruvathai..." see this.He lies in ground bleeding.Opposite to him stands his killer.he calls him as "oviyathu elutha onna uruvathoye.."
Next vali remembers seetha.How? "sanakan petra annam"--see the words,"sanakan petra annam"--
Next abuse "Appa,if you are merciless on me,who will show mercy to me?"See the word "Appa"
Next abuse "karunai vallale.."
Next abuse "Thonmayin nool ellavatrukkum eraiva.."--see the abuse.
Next vali abuses laxmana.How?
"Thai ena uyirkku nalgi dharmamai nindra thambi...".
Laxmana is abused as "dharmamai nindra thambi" .
vali closes his abuse as follows.
"Evu koor valiyal eithu nai adiyanen arivu thandhu arulinai.Moovar nee,mutrum nee,muthalvan nee,matrum nee,dharmam nee,paavam nee,pagayum nee,uravum nee" (vali means arrow here,nai means dog)And vali closes by calling Rama as "dharmame" and "oviya uruva"
When kambar describes seetha he forgets everything.When Rama met seetha for the first time in mithilai kambar describes seetha as
"ponnin jothi,thenin theem suvai,kavi inbam,thalir maane,thene,amuthe "...and he closes it with "ip pavai thondralal alagum or alagu petrathe".
He says beauty got beauty since this woman was born.
"Annalum nokkinal,avalum nokkinal" is popular.But see the lines before it.
"kannodu kan kavvi,ondrai ondru unna,unarvum ondrida annalum nokkinan,avalum nokkinal"...
"Eyes swallowed eyes and ate each other....." can anybody write anything better than this?
VVS Iyer wrote in 1950 about kambar as follows.
"It is not easy to convince the literary world at this late hour of the day that there is, unsuspected by the greater part of it, a Tamil poet who is worthy to take rank with the greatest names in literature. It is, however, my purpose in this book to make an attempt to prove that in the Ramayana of Kamban the world possesses an epic which can challenge comparison not merely with the 'Iliad' and the 'Aeneid', the 'Paradise Lost' and the 'Mahabharata', but with its original itself, namely, the 'Ramayana' of Valmiki. This is not the language of mere patriotic enthusiasm. It is an opinion that has grown slowly with the years and after deep and careful study. And I hope to make the impartial reader rise from the study of this monograph with a conviction of the truth of my contention and with a desire to know more of the poet than what he will see exhibited within the pages of this volume...
I spoke of Valmiki's work as the original of Kamban's Ramayana. But Kamban has not translated Valmiki. He has merely taken the story immortalised by the Aryan sage and, though he has followed it closely enough in all its details, has written an entirely original poem. Bentley said of Pope's Iliad', 'It is a pretty poem, but you must not call it Homer.' Of Kamban's Ramayana we should say reversing the language, it is not Valmiki Ramayana, but it is a grander poem.'
...The reader will have noticed that the Ramayana follows in its natural order the life of the hero from his birth and childhood up to the close of the action which forms its theme. On the other hand, the epics of Europe, as is well known, follow their prototype and example, the 'Iliad', and start the story as near the end as possible, filling in the earlier events by slight allusions as well as by episodic narrative. These epics have an undeniable advantage over the Indian maha kavyas in that their dramatic opening arrests the imagination even at the very commencement of the poem, while the Indian epics have to gather momentum before they are able to carry with them the attention of the modern reader. But our great epic poets have proved one may tell a story in the chronological order and yet write a poem that generations will not willingly let die...
....The build and structure of the Ramayana of Kamban are superb. The poem satisfies the soul with its ampleur, the proportion of its parts, and the art with which the parts are combined into an organic whole...Kamban has shown his genius for the architectonics of poetry both where he follows Valmiki as well as where he departs from his order...
...Now the plot in almost all its details is Valmiki's. But if Kamban takes the situations from Valmiki, he has treated them absolutely in his own way. In the manner of developing the situations, in the gradation by which the climax of each situation is brought about, in the justesse which knows how to bring about all its capabilities out of each situation, we feel the touch of the master artist. In the manner also in which the incidents have been joined together to form the whole, no ordinary skill has been displayed. Every limb of Kamban's story is of course familiar to the student of Valmiki. But on going through the whole poem of Kamban, one is constrained to exclaim, 'Here is a building which is built on the same plan no doubt, and with the same materials, but which possesses a striking individuality of its own.'...
..In the delineation of character, Kamban stands on a level with the greatest poets in the world. The lines are drawn with a firm hand, and the characters are painted with such accuracy and fullness that from any single sentence, and sometimes even from a single phrase in a speech, one can tell the person speaking without any the least doubt.
Here too, Valmiki has set the stamp on the characters of the Ramayana. But in Kamban's hand they have become much more grand. The student of Valmiki will wonder how his Rama and Bharata, Ravana and Kumbhakarna, Vali and Hanuman, Sita and Kausalya, and the rest could be improved. The fact, however, is there that Kamban's heroes and heroines are beings of a decidedly higher stature than those of Valmiki..."
Welcome to the group. Its a fantastic start by you. I too read tamil only till my class 8th. But recetntly got interested in tamil and trying to learn tamil (even today I cant write tamil without spelling mistakes, which I really feel bad about).
Your comparison is good. Kambar is Kavichakravarthy. No one can match him, as you said. I learnt the greatness of Kambar only reading 'Pathirapadaipu' articles by Mr. Harikrishnan. Hope people belonging to Marabilakkiyam yahoogroup know who Mr.Hari is. If Kambar gave a beautiful epic, Mr.Hari is doing a great service by highlighting the characters of Ramayana. I think I already wrote about this website. www.harimozhi.com. Mr.Hari has completed the characterisation of Hanuman and now working on Bharatan. The site apart from his other works has the Ramayana part also. Its worth reading.
I too am thinking of buying a good Kamba Ramayanam with urai, so that I can appreciate its beauty. Dont know when I will start.
But Kamba Ramayana is in poetic form, where as Kalki's ponniyinselvan is prose. So directly we cant compare them both. For the modern times, Kalki is the best, all time kambar is the best. I dont think there will be a second opinion on this. The beauty of Kalki, I feel is, he inspired many more writers to write 'sarithira' novels..I think Ponniyin selvan is the forerunner of all the other historical novels in tamil. If one person can instigate such a feeling to lakhs of people, thats his greatness.
Kamban, kalki, all are immortal legends who cant be discussed and understood by mortals like us.Thats my feeling.But sure they make a good discussion for us to sip a handful from the great ocean of literature.