Pallipadai temples are temples built for the deceased during the middle ages. Let us go back in time even further and see the origins of this cult. Even before man became fully civilized he began to realize that the dead bodies of people whom he loved or respected / adored have to be buried or kept in order. The mudhu makkal thazhis - as they are called in tamil - found in many parts of tamilnadu ( I remember some finding in Lalgudi and Naarthamalai) remind us that this practice goes back by few thousand years. The Hindu philosophy did not encourage burying the dead bodies nor constructing any monuments around it. This is in striking contrast to every other civilization of those times around the world - especially egypt. Hinduism advocated that the body to be burnt and that the ashes and bones immersed in a holy river. "Go back to the formless form where you came from". In a way this methodology is almost poetic in nature. There is a strong philosophical background to this practice. Hinduism strongly advocates that the human body is but a temporary abode and that such abodes have changed over a period of time. "Like an old shirt being thrown out and new shirt being worn, so does the atman shreads its old body and takes a new one" - Bhagawad Gita
Thus we hardly find any temple or memorial built even for great hindu kings who ruled on this land.
But there were some exceptions.
For example, when Lord Buddha attained Nirvana, his body was burnt and ash pots were taken all over and big stupas were built around it. Buddhists believe that when buddha's body was cremated, there were holy crystals formed all over his body. These are held as the holiest relics and I was blessed to see one in Thailad. It looks like a very small crystal and is hardly visible to naked eyes.
As it seems, there were atleast some classes or cults in hinduism that allowed alternate practice. It is unclear to me whether monuments were allowed to be built on top of the holy bodies or over the cremated ash pot. Possibly the latter.
Back to the topic in discussion.
Pallipadais is a middle age cult phenomenon and seems to have been closely associated with the laguleesa shaivite cult. For those who do not know, Laguleesa is one form of shaivism that originated in orissa. There were many forms like kaapalika, kaalamukha, paasupatha - laguleesa and so on. Though they all have Lord shiva as supreme god, the philosophies are quite different.
It is quite unclear to me how laguleesa - pasupatha it caught the attention of royal classes of the south. References trace back that they had become a strong cult during pallava days. Appar peruman sings of shiva in paasupatha form, kaapalika form and so on.
The earliest pallipadai reference in an inscription from the south. It mentions of a pallipadai called "Miladudaiyar pallipadai". Unfortunately we have lost this structure and hence do not have any idea of how it looked like.
but gokul didnt the palipadais have a negative connotation with the general public. i am not only referring to kalkis description of ethiriyin pallipadai at purambaiyam abut also in the last trip to tanjore by ps group in sep 2005 we saw the word pallipadai having been voluntarily erased in panchavan madevi pallipadai near swami malai.
were pallipadais honoured as other temples, patronised by the public? venketesh