comparing apples and oranges
  • ArunKrishnan,

    Kamba Ramayana too is a story.We only are comparing similarities
    between both works,not dissimilarities.We compare the common themes
    like characterization,description,script,handling of controversial
    events etc.

    Kalki fares better than kamban in many aspects.As Drsridhar Rathnam
    pointed out kalki created the whole story from his creative mind.His
    works reached masses and made even ordinary man to enjoy
    literature.I got interested in history only becasue i read Ponniyin
    selvan.Kamban's work remains in an ivory tower till date.

    There are many people better than kamban in many aspects.Vyasa's
    charaectirization beats every other work in the world(as far as I
    know)The plots and twists he uses in mahabharatha with such huge
    number of characters and with giving unique nature and role to each
    of them and the coherence with which he moves the story is
    unparalleled.

    The character of purichravas comes just in the last part.He has only
    2 pages.But the importance purichravas gets in those two pages is
    mindboggling.Similiar is bhagadathan character ,a 90 year old man
    whose eyesight is blocked by wrinkles on his forehead.He ties up his
    wrinkles with a silkthread and sits on his elephent supradeepam and
    wreaks havoc in pandava army.

    In end arjuna cuts off his silkthread and bhagadatha loses his
    eyesight.Then arjuna sends an arrow into the bowels of the
    elephent.Vyasa then narrates what happened as follows.

    "The blind bagadatha not knowing what happened to his elephent
    supradeepam forced it to fight with arjuna.But like how a wife wont
    listen to the words of a husband who has lost the family
    fortunes,supradeepam for the first time in life refused to listen to
    the words of bagadatha"

    I will write more on this in some other time.

    I will write a bit on valmigi though.He wrote Ramayana through a
    funny incident.He was a saint.One day he saw two lustful birds
    copulating.He was very happy to see the two birds being happy.But
    suddenly an arrow killed the male bird.Seeing this the female bird
    also died.A hunter came to pick up the birds.Valmigi went mad in
    rage.He immediatly said in sorrow to the hunter as follows

    "Oh the one equal to a tree,you killed a lustful creature.Till the
    sun and moon exists you will be remembered for this"

    He did not curse the hunter though.He was very sad and came back
    home.He then thought of the words he said at the hunter.He thought
    on the first words "equal to a tree"(mara) He pronounced it
    continuously mara mara mara ....and it became rama,rama.

    Then suddenly the verse he used to scold the hunter became the verse
    to praise rama.Rama was the hunter.The lustful male bird was
    ravana.The suffering female bird was mandothari.The hunter killed
    the lustful bird and for that he will be remembered till the sun and
    moon existed.

    The verse suddenly had a new meaning

    "Oh Rama,you killed the lustful creature.Till the sun and moon exist
    you will be remembered for it"

    Thus was born the epic of ramayana.

    Ofcourse I am not saying that Ramayana was a fictional creation of
    Valmigi.Legend has it that Valmigi wrote Ramayana only after god
    appeared before him and said that he wanted valmigi to write
    Ramayana and that is why this whole drama was played.

    we compare works across time only to pay our homages to the dead
    authors and to be a guide to authors of future and to develop our
    literary knowledge.Some do it for ego serving too,which I dont blame.
    Without "vidhya garvam" a scholar isnt a scholar.But when it becomes
    "padicha thimir" he will be knocked down to earth sooner or later.

    That is when literary meetings come in handy.They not only point out
    what the faults are with the authors but also point out the fault in
    the approach of the debaters.

    When nakkerar said that "Even women from devalokam have no natural
    fragrance in their hair" he was knocked down by shivaperuman himself.
    Becasue nakkerar couldnt have known the fragrance of the hair of
    women in devalokam.He went to the extent of saying "Even the Uma
    devi whom I worship doesnt have a natural fragrance in her hair"

    Here he was making an unsubstantiated claim.So he was knocked down
    by shivaperuman himself.This is just a legend though.Valluvan also
    wrote this as avaiadakkam.
  • Dear Sampath,

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters