myth of arianisation
  • Lord McCauley in his speech of Feb 2,1835, British Parliament

    "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have
    not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I
    have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such
    caliber,that I do not think we would ever conquer this country,
    unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her
    spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose
    that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture,
    for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is
    good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem,
    their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a
    truly dominated nation".

    -Lord McCauley in his speech of Feb 2,1835, British Parliament

    This is how aryanisation started in India.Such
    theories without any base were spread by British earlier.Except the
    stooges of the british,justice party ,nobody believed it.Now justice
    party and its avathars have become popular as dmk and dk and thats
    why such theories are still alive today.

    Tamil grammar was composed by agathaiyar,a
    rishi mentioned in vedas.Tamils proudly say that agathiya muni gave
    them grammar through his book agathyam.And agathya muni lived even
    before the period of Ramayana.And Ramayana's period is dated 5000
    years before christ.

    You mention any ancient tamil book,there vedas
    and hindu gods are glorified.Tamil's second or first book
    tholkappiyam was written by a bhramin,tholkappiyar.Even oldest tamil
    books hail the virtues of hindu gods.Avvayar,who lived in sangam age
    is a devotee of kanda and ganesh.

    Many sangam age kings had names like "pal yaga
    salai mudhu kudumi peruvaluthi".Lord shiva himself built the temple
    of meenakshi in madurai and ruled madurai as "ukra pandia
    peruvaluthi".

    Sangam age madurai people prided themselves as
    "People of Tanjore wake up hearing noise of kolzi(cholas were also
    called as kozhi vendar),but people of madurai wake up daily hearing
    veda chanting and breathing holy smoke from yagnas"

    So when did this aryan invasion take place?When
    evidence came that shiva and vishnu worship in tamilnadu are as
    ancient as hills, dravidian scholars(???)created a new theory.So
    according to them aryans adapted indian gods in their vedas.So
    instead of aryanization of dravidians,now they say the
    reverse.Vishnu,shiva,parvathi,ganesh and skanda are glorified in
    vedas.So even before vedic period dravidisation of aryans
    happened.THis happened while aryans invaded and conquered dravidians.
    Great logic this is.

    In mahabharatha and ramayana pandya kings are glorified.In mother
    seetha's swayamvara a pandya king participated.IN mahabharatha war a
    pandya king fought and died for pandavas.So all evidence suggests
    that aryan invasion happened only in the minds of mccauley and
    justice party's avathars.

    As more and more evidence comes out aryan invasion goes back and
    back.Earlier it was during 3rd century bc.Then it went to vedic
    period.Then it went back to pre-vedic period.Now people have gone to
    stone age and say aryans invaded when dravidians were in stone
    age.Next guess would be big bang.

    This is what happened actually.

    Whole world earlier followed one religion(vedic),had one language
    (proto-indo-european or sandas)had one holy symbol(swasthika) and
    one culture(vedic)

    In India people in north were called aryans and people in south were
    dravidians.Even bhramins in south india were dravidians(rahul
    dravid,a bhramin stands as the living proof)

    Irish(rootword erie i.e aryans),iran(aryan) all are offshoot of this
    one single culture.That culture exists today only In india in its
    uncorrupted version.

    This is the truth.I will give further proof in my next mails.
  • Dear Priya
    Interesting.....Can I be the devil's advocate and ask what is the archeological evidence of the time frame of agathiyam,tholkappiyam,mahabharat and ramayan.....based on archeological evidence? radiocarbon dating?
  • Dear Priya

    If the british really wanted to confuse indians and demoralise them they could have just stopped with the hindu moslem division....

    Sri

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters