I am surprised. We are open to discusion and if there are alternate views produce it with facts.
It is history forum and liberal views have to be backed with facts. If you want to say some thing without facts then it is not HISTORY.
If any one can tell me that , what ever i said is not backed with facts, i am ready to agree. Liberal or Right wing views are not HISTORY. HISTORY should be only fact-fact and fact backed with proof.
Since i am qouted, i will show 3 things. 1. I have a very liberal view on Periyar and respect him. ( In fact you dont agree with me on Periyar) 2. I have alsoagreed that Thali is a very late addition. 3. I have clearly agreed on the greatness of other religious heads.
But, Views are different and facts are different. Facts w.o back up is not history.