ur clarifications
  • Hi
    i had already mailed u that what kalki has written
    need not necessarily be history completely. n i will
    try n produce the exact woirdings of the kalvetu
    sometime later.
    also, please note that after he came to power, he
    has done a lot of good things n earned his name... but
    the fact is he had been part of the conspiracy. n
    pleae remember that there is no kalvettu to prove that
    senthan amudhan existed... the chola kalvettugal are
    so exhaustive at ;least as far as the ruling king is
    concerned. so if such a thing was there it would have
    been brought out in a kalvetu i guess..
    will try n substantiate if i get more info...
    In the meanwhile please tell me if u r convinced..or
    not convinced..

  • I also think sendhan amudhan is a fictious character. One has to check the works done by vikraman too... Don't mistake me i am not a fan of vikraman's work... but there has been some research done by him and based on conversation with people who are still at it, it appears that sendhan amudhan is a fictious character and it is possible that kalki started with the story and had to change the course based on some later evidence...

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters