Shadows and vimanams (was KARUVURAR)
  • Excellent, sir. I have attached three pics of tanjai temple by google
    earth - 29jun2009, 28aug2007 and 15nov2007. In november photos, the
    shadow appears to confirm the legend.
    The temple is tilted by about 20 deg NE. I am not sure if attachment of
    files is allowed; if not, I will put them in the files section.
    Sampath
  • I have uploaded three pictures in the 'google earth temple images'
    folder in the Photos section.Sampath
  • Hi
    the temple is tilted and not true to the cardinal directions.
    some how it was built parallel to the vadavar on the south
    or was the river diverted(?)
    wonder which of our other great temples were true to direction
    venketesh
  • SPS sir,
    There is a message in red that I do not have the right to upload photos.
    The three pictures I uploaded are not saved in the 'photos' section.
    Will appreciate if the block can be removed.
  • In srirangam, the main temple is due south. Outer praharams are a bit
    skewed by about 1 deg SW.
    Sampath
  • chidambaram seems aligned to cardinal directions but outer walls are skewed
    how would an ancient architect align his temple to the cardinal direction when he did not have a compass? would he wait for an equinox?
    venketesh
  • I have not seen any claim that this is the ONLY temple with the unique
    "shadow less" feature; perhaps some over zealous enthusiasts might have
    done it taking a cue from american publishers - #1 in readership, max
    viewership etc.
    Facts can become legends if evidence is lost and only memories remain.
    Google images of the temple are added in the folder "google earth temple
    images" in the Photos section.
    Sampath
  • Google images of the temple are added in the folder "google earth temple
    images" in the Photos section.
    tanjai temple 28aug2007.jpgtanjai temple 15nov2007.jpgtanjai temple
    29jun2009.jpg
    Thanks SPS.
    Sampath
  • yes You are right

    Now there is a Ramayana circuit conducted in Srilanka. There is a place called Sita eilia and the story is Sita was kept captive there.

    Since i am collecting all evidences south of Nellore - Had a discussion with some Srilankan
    people. Elia in Sinhala is High place. Sita is the compressed form of sitala which means cold. ( refer setala mata, seetak kalaba senthamaraippoom padam of vinayagar agaval - in most of the indian languages seeta is cold. in fact the word seethoshnam is seeta (cold) + Ushnam)

    Hence the actual meaning of sita elia is cold hill. But now this is turned out to be ashoka vanam.

    Then if a stone is yellow then that is where sita - manjal araithal and if any stones is red - then seetha kumkumam itta idam.
  • Oh, they had better methods...

    I'll write about it when I finish reading (and doing some experiments)...

    Shash
  • May I take it that most of us are convinced that temple's shadow falls
    within its base at noon time all through the year - winter solstice to
    summer solstice. The google earth image of nov 2007 (added in the photos
    section in the folder google earth images) adds support to this view. In
    this photo, the slight shadow on the west side will vanish when the sun
    travels a bit to the west.
    The base of the temple is about 85 to 90 feet square (most of the
    gopurams have a rectangular base); another hypothesis could be - it is
    the tallest tower that can be built for the given base area and which
    meets the absent-shadow criteria. (like importance of L/D ratio for
    buckling of columns). In addition the base is skewed by about 24 deg NE.
    Another parameter to be considered is the ayanamsa - precession of the
    earth's axis, which shifts by 1 degree in about 72 years. And the temple
    was built about 1000 years ago.
    What were the minimum, defining design/ construction parameters set by
    RRC?
    Eiffel tower's design entry was selected because of the claim that the
    tower had minimum weight.
    Just a few random thoughts!
    Sampath
  • Most of the temples have short vimanams; tanjai temple and Gangai konda
    cholapuram vimanams are quite tall and can perhaps be called vimana
    gopuram.
    What other temples have such tall vimanams?
    Cholapuram vimanam is 95 feet square (calculated from google earth image
    (from lattitudes and longitudes). Its height is about 183 feet, compared
    to 85 feet square and 216 feet high of tanjai temple). Cholapuram
    vimanam looks quite squat whereas tanjai looks slender and sleek.
    Cholapuram temple faces due east.
    Sampath
  • GKC gopuram takes a small bend half way( that reduces its size) .
    actually it looks like the bent pyramid of giza
  • It's not a bend, as much as a curve running throughout the gopuram... Of all
    the Dravida style temples, it is probably the one most deserving of the
    common Brit usage of the word 'pagoda'. It _is_ very Pagoda-like...

    Shash
  • was the architect trying to imitate chidambaram golden vimanam at a larger scale?



    > It's not a bend, as much as a curve running throughout the gopuram... Of all
    > the Dravida style temples, it is probably the one most deserving of the
    > common Brit usage of the word 'pagoda'. It _is_ very Pagoda-like...
    >
    > Shash
    >
  • As per wiki, cholapuram tower is with octogon shape compared to straight
    sided pyramid of peria koil.
    quote:
    "As one steps in, the great Vimana arrests the visitor's sight. The
    Vimana with its recessed corners and upward movement presents a striking
    contrast to the straight-sided pyramidal tower of Thanjavur but with
    octagon shape of Dravidian architecture. As it rises to a height of 182
    feet (55 m) and is shorter than the Thanjavur tower with larger plinth,
    it is often described as the feminine counterpart of the Thanjavur
    temple."
    sampath

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters