Kamal Haasan’s ‘Dasavatharam’draws effusive early re
  • I dont know why some didnt like this movie. Its really a milestone in
    Indian cinema. No one ever dared to attempt it so far.
    As said, its only because of Kamal..if anyother, it would have been
    considered a good film.The story and script are of international
    standards. We should surely applaud Kamal for it.

    Doing 10 roles, though not needed, is still a daring attempt. All 10
    characters beautifully merged towards the end is the masterpiece of
    Kamals script.

    As Ravi said, comparing with Sivaji, this one is no lesser. Sivaji
    was grand, this is awesome. Sivaji is frame by frame Rajni, this is
    frame by frame kamal including his script, which is a + compared to
    Sivaji. Its not fair to say this movie is junk.

    I commented on the make up and graphics only for one reason - the
    hype was too much and people said its of hollywood standard. If they
    had said its the best so far done in Indian cinema, i would have
    never commented. Telling that its of international standard and when
    not met, i was a bit disappointed. Otherwise, surley the make up and
    graphics are mind boggling.

    Kamal always lacked luck. None of his attempts are given their due
    credits. But one flaw in the script - why 12th century story without
    any relevance?
  • I dont know why some didnt like this movie. Its really a milestone in
    Indian cinema. No one ever dared to attempt it so far.
    As said, its only because of Kamal..if anyother, it would have been
    considered a good film.The story and script are of international
    standards. We should surely applaud Kamal for it.

    Doing 10 roles, though not needed, is still a daring attempt. All 10
    characters beautifully merged towards the end is the masterpiece of
    Kamals script.

    As Ravi said, comparing with Sivaji, this one is no lesser. Sivaji
    was grand, this is awesome. Sivaji is frame by frame Rajni, this is
    frame by frame kamal including his script, which is a + compared to
    Sivaji. Its not fair to say this movie is junk.

    I commented on the make up and graphics only for one reason - the
    hype was too much and people said its of hollywood standard. If they
    had said its the best so far done in Indian cinema, i would have
    never commented. Telling that its of international standard and when
    not met, i was a bit disappointed. Otherwise, surley the make up and
    graphics are mind boggling.

    Kamal always lacked luck. None of his attempts are given their due
    credits. But one flaw in the script - why 12th century story without
    any relevance?
  • I am able to relate the 12th century story to the end, only puzzle
    was the 130 cr... (*^$*#$@#@) ivalo panam oru padathukku thevaya ?
    are there not other good things to do with that money? I dont believe
    it is necessary to spend so much money for a movie unless you have
    the film single handedly changes the mind set or political scenario
    of a country. I think there needs to be more responsiblity shown with
    directing these movies.

    Did Aascar (numerogy ...i think) pay for 10 kamals or one ?

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters