Yesterday i was talking to Mr. Sundar Bharadwaj and we discussed about the character of Uthama cholan in PS. Some questions arised that why kalki handled this character in a chaos state. Why no incident or narration was not concrete with respect to Uthama cholan?
Was kalki himself not clear about this character?
The answer for this question will be certainly NO. Because, Thiru Neelakanda Sasthiri clearly explained the incidents happened during and after the murder of AK very well in his book and kalki was also AWARE that Uthama cholan was also a co-conspirator of AK's murder.
Even then, why didn't he mention in PS about his involvement in the conspiracy?
Any thoughts?
Then, 4 or 5 weeks ago, while talking to Dr. Kalaikkovan, he said that Sambuvaraiyars didn't exist during the period of Sundara and Rajaraja cholan. Only 2 or 3 centuries after cholas they came to power. And he added that the Sambuvaraiyar's part in PS is a fictitions one.
If so, where did Ravidasan & co murder AK? In Udaiyar, Balakumaran wrote that AK was killed in Kodumbalur. Then, how did AK's dead body come to Veeranarayana puram Eari?
Since AK is a crown prince, there must be some 'Meikkaappaalarkal' for him. What were they doing during the murder? How did Ravidasan & co bring the dead body out of the fort by hacking the security of the fort?
Please throw some light on this.
Ungal vilakkangalai aavaludan edhir nookkiyirukkum Kamal
Dear KamalAre we confusing facts and fiction...I think Kalki actually handled the situation quite deftly making..two madhuranthagans and making the evil one flee as a pandiya prince moreover it is difficult to imagine sambuvarayars didnt exist during PS times Cheers Sridhar...